Inaugural performance ranking of 208 growth capital firms by highly respected HEC Paris-DowJones
Strategy Professor Oliver Gottschalg of HEC Paris Business School has released the first edition of the HEC Paris-DowJones Growth Capital Performance Ranking of Growth Capital Funds. The new ranking analyses the performance of private equity (PE) firms in growth capital investments, in other words, investments which target already profitable companies with the purpose of helping them grow further.
The ranking, an addition to the HEC Paris – DowJones Private Equity Rankings series, shows a strong dominance of US companies, accompanied by the presence of what is often labeled as the "rest of the world" from a PE perspective, with Japan, Vietnam, Hong Kong, and India featuring in the top 20. 12 out of 20 top companies are from the US.
Neither European nor UK-based growth capital players made it onto the list of worldwide firms.
The three top companies include US-based Ampersand Capital Partners who topped the list with a performance score of 2.6, followed by Spark Capital at 2.21 and Spectrum Equity at 1.51.
Prof. Gottschalg explains that growth capital funds are difficult to define as definitions vary according to the stage of the VC fund, or if these are growth-oriented buyouts.
“However, given the increased relevance of this sub-asset class in private equity, we thought it was important to disclose further information and transparency with a new ranking. Our study is based on a clear categorization, following the definition as “Growth Capital Fund” of our primary external data source, Preqin,” he explains.
Prof. Gottschalg analyzed performance data from 208 growth capital firms and the 390 funds they raised, with an aggregate equity volume of $245bn. The ranking is unique in its methodology, aggregating performance across vintage years and considering relative and absolute returns.
This ranking lists the world's top private equity firms that raised over $100m over a decade in terms of aggregate performance based on all their growth capital funds raised between 2009 and 2018.
The Worldwide Growth Capital Ranking
|1||Ampersand Capital Partners|
|5||Riyada Managers B.V.|
|6||Ten Coves Capital|
Limited importance of size and sector
The results also found that the best-performing growth capital funds are not specialized in any particular "growth sector". „In fact, all of the top five follow a rather diversified approach”, adds Professor Gottschalg.
The ranking shows that only two of the top ten are explicit sector specialists: US-Based Ten Coves Capital with a focus on Financial Services and Japanese Whiz Partners with a Focus on Healthcare and adjacent industries. “Not surprisingly, these are also the two fund managers with the lowest cumulative amount of capital raised in out vintage decade in the top ten,” he adds.
In addition and as explained by Prof. Gottschalg: "The results reveal that size is no obstacle to top performance, as ‘Growth Giants’ like Insight or Summit can make it into the Global top ten.“
"There is a noticeable concentration of fundraising volume in the top ten; considering the cumulative capital raised from 2009 to 2018, these two “heavyweights” jointly represent more than half of the capital raised by all of the top 20 Growth Capital GPs," he explains.
This ranking answers the question: “which firms in the Growth Capital segment generated the best performance for their investors over the past years?”
The ranking draws on a comprehensive set of data on PE fund performance sourced from preqin and directly from PE Firms and uses a unique methodology to calculate the aggregate performance of a PE firm based on different performance measures for all the funds managed by this firm.
The method is able to aggregate performance across vintage years and considers relative and absolute returns. In total, we analyzed performance data from 208 Growth Capital firms and the 390 funds they raised between 2009 and 2018 with an aggregate equity volume of $245B.
To obtain a most accurate picture of the universe of PE Firms and their investments, researchers drew on a variety of available databases and performed a number of cross-checks of the information used in this study. They used the preqin PE fund performance database as the primary database for fund performance information, in addition to an increasing amount of information directly provided by PE Firms to HEC Paris for the purpose of these rankings.